Article

Biologics Better Methotrexate in Pediatric Psoriasis Reduction

Author(s):

A comparative assessment shows children with psoriasis have a four-fold increased risk of reaching PASI 75 with biologics.

Inge M. G. H. Bronckers, MD

Inge M. G. H. Bronckers, MD

Biologics are associated with a greater mean improvement in pediatric psoriasis severity than methotrexate, according to a comparative trial in 200-plus real-world patients.

An international, retrospective review of North American and European children with psoriasis treated with either biologic therapy or methotrexate showed the former had greater long-term benefits for Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores than the latter.

Investigators, led by Inge M. G. J. Bronckers, MD, of the Department of Dermatology at Radboud University in the Netherlands, believe this and future comparative analyses could inform prescribing choices for pediatric psoriasis for patients across multiple countries.

Psoriasis, despite affecting more than 1% of children worldwide, has a scarcity of approved and regulated agents for treatment. Bronckers and colleagues noted that direct comparative data among such limited options is also few and far between—complicating the selection of individualized medication for patients.

While methotrexate has been the most commonly prescribed and least expensive systemic agent for psoriasis across international markets, targeted biologic therapies including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and interleukin 12 and 23 (IL-12; IL-23) inhibitors have also shown particular efficacy and safety among pediatric plaque psoriasis patients.

Despite both methotrexate and TNF inhibitors having used for at least the past decade, only adalimumab has been compared in a head-to-head trial with the most common therapy. Investigators sought the relative reduction in severity and real-world use of methotrexate and biologics in real-world pediatric patients using a retrospective analysis of psoriasis severity scores and drug survival of both classes.

The team gauged medical records from 20 European and North American centers. There were 234 participants with moderate to severe psoriasis, who received at least 3 months of methotrexate or biologics from December 1, 1990 to September 16, 2014. Patients were 56% (n = 131) female, with almost two-thirds (63%) coming from North America.

Treatment response was gauged with PASI and PGA score change from baseline to 6 months—with PASI 75 indicating its highest achievable score, and PGA 0 indicating clear skin.

A majority of patients (n = 163 [69.7%]) exclusively received methotrexate, while 20.1% (n = 47) exclusively received biologics. The remaining 24 (10.2%) children received both drug classes sequentially—with all but 1 (n = 23) receiving methotrexate initially.

Mean patient age at methotrexate initiation was 11.6 (3.7) years, versus 13.3 (2.9) years for biologics.

At 6 months, PASI 75 was achieved in 12 of 30 (40%) patients receiving methotrexate, and 20 of 28 (71.4%) patients receiving biologics. PGA scores of 0-1, indicating clear or almost clear skin, was achieved in 41 of 115 (35.6%) patients receiving methotrexate, and 18 of 37 (48.6%) patients receiving biologics.

Pediatric patients with psoriasis were significantly more likely to achieve PASI 75 (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.02-10.27; P <.001) and/or PGA 1 or 2 (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.98-4.00; P = .06) by 6 months when treated with biologics than methotrexate.

Bronckers and colleagues reported that at 1, 3, and 5 years of use, overall drug survival rates for methotrexate were 77.5%, 50.3%, and 35.9%, respectively. For biologics, the rates were 83.4%, 64.3%, and 57.1%, respectively.

Investigators noted the prospective findings have underestimated the efficacy of methotrexate, both due to the shortened duration of observed care, and for the low mean dosages administered to observed patients. There was also fewer observation of pediatric patients administered subcutaneous methotrexate instead of oral.

That said, psoriasis severity reduction was pronounced among patients treated with biologics, and showed a greater drug survival—a critical metric for the treatment of a chronic condition.

“In addition to their documented efficacy, biologics are convenient to use, require less monitoring, and are associated with fewer treatment-related toxic effects than conventional agents in children, making them an attractive treatment option,” Bronckers and colleagues wrote. “Nevertheless, biologics are much more costly than methotrexate, even with the required laboratory monitoring for the latter, and methotrexate still has an important position in the treatment of pediatric psoriasis.”

Investigators called for prospective comparative analyses with more uniform data to ensure real-world practice studies can complement the data found from randomized psoriasis treatment trials.

The study, “A Comparison of Psoriasis Severity in Pediatric Patients Treated With Methotrexate vs Biologic Agents,” was published online in JAMA Dermatology.

Related Videos
Implications of Findings on Patient-Reported Outcomes for Roflumilast Foam, with Melinda Gooderham, MD
New Findings on Psoriasis Outcomes for Roflumilast Foam 0.3%, with Melinda Gooderham, MD
Discussing 140-Week Data on Upadacitinib for Atopic Dermatitis, with Raj Chovatiya, MD, PhD
ADORING Trial Open-Label Extension: Tapinarof Cream 1% Results in Atopic Dermatitis
Linda Stein Gold, MD: Discussing New Phase 3b Data on Lebrikizumab for Atopic Dermatitis
Andrea Murina, MD: Drug Pipeline for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Omega-3 Supplements for Rosacea and Other Tips for Dermatologists, with Andrea Murina, MD
Methods to Manage Psoriasis Using Oral Therapies, with Andrea Murina, MD
2 Additional Clinical Pearls for Dermatologists, with Eingun James Song, MD
2 Helpful Clinical Tips for Dermatologists, with Eingun James Song, MD
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.