Article

Biologics for PsA not Associated with Higher Heart Disease Risk

Study shows there is no substantial difference in cardiovascular risk associated with different biologic therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients.

PsA (©AdobeStock_Viktar)

Patients receiving ustekinumab or TNFi therapies for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis experience no substantial difference in risks for atrial fibrillationor major adverse cardiovascular events, a new study showed.

Expanding evidence indicates this patient population faces a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, making early intervention to control systemic inflammation preferable. Published in JAMA Dermatology, the study provides reassurance that these therapies affect this patient population in a similar way.

The study included 60,028 participants-9,071 received ustekinumab and 50,957 received TNFi. Men accounted for 49.1 percent of enrollees, totaling 29,495. Ustekinumab patients were slightly younger with a mean age of 46 years versus 47.3 for TNFi patients.

The patient groups had differences. The TNFi group had a higher proportion of patients with a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis, nonbiological DMARD use, and steroids. They also had more office visits and more patients using NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, and opioids.  Ustekinumab patients were more likely to have exposure to other biologic DMARDs, UV light, and topical therapies, as well as more inpatient and outpatient visits that resulted in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis diagnoses.

For atrial fibrillation, during a nearly 18-month follow-up period, 383 cases were identified: 60 for ustekinumab patients and 323 for TNFi.

During the follow-up period, 495 major adverse cardiovascular event cases emerged:  74 in ustekinumab and 421 in TNFi.

The results support previous findings that there’s no substantial difference in cardiovascular risk associated with different biologic therapies.

Researchers said these results can be used to weigh the risks and benefits of various systemic treatment strategies for psoriatic disease.

“Although the risk of these cardiovascular outcomes appeared to be similar across the subpopulations included in our study,” they said, “further investigations on potentially modifying treatment effects stratified by important risk factors may be warranted.”

REFERENCE

Lee M, Desai R, Jin Y, Brill G, Ogdie A, Kim S, Association of Ustekinumab vs TNF Inhibitor Therapy With Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthiritis. JAMA Dermatology (2019), doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0001

Related Videos
Kimberly A. Davidow, MD: Elucidating Risk of Autoimmune Disease in Childhood Cancer Survivors
Matthew J. Budoff, MD: Examining the Interplay of Coronary Calcium and Osteoporosis | Image Credit: Lundquist Institute
Orrin Troum, MD: Accurately Imaging Gout With DECT Scanning
John Stone, MD, MPH: Continuing Progress With IgG4-Related Disease Research
Philip Conaghan, MBBS, PhD: Investigating NT3 Inhibition for Improving Osteoarthritis
Rheumatologists Recognize the Need to Create Pediatric Enthesitis Scoring Tool
Presence of Diffuse Cutaneous Disease Linked to Worse HRQOL in Systematic Sclerosis
Alexei Grom, MD: Exploring Safer Treatment Options for Refractory Macrophage Activation Syndrome
Jack Arnold, MBBS, clinical research fellow, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine
John Tesser, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, Midwestern University, and Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, and Lecturer, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, and Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.