Video

Can a Peer Education Program Improve Patient Engagement and Health Equity in Lupus Research?

Author(s):

Enrollment in clinical trials across all disease states, particularly in lupus, continues to be an ongoing challenge.

Rheumatology Network interviewed Caroline Donovan, Manager of Patient Engagement at Lupus Research Alliance, to discuss the recent study “Feasibility and Efficacy of a Peer Education Program to Improve Patient Engagement in Lupus Clinical Trials Goal.” The study focused on the importance of improving awareness, knowledge, and enrollment of minorities in lupus clinical trials via the Lupus Therapeutics' Patient Advocates for Lupus Studies (LT-PALS) program.

Enrollment in clinical trials across all disease states, particularly in lupus, continues to be an ongoing challenge.

“Specifically, it's been challenging to make sure that we are enrolling individuals representative of the lupus population,” Donovan noted. “We you know that in order for us to have any sort of new treatments, or even cures, there has to be clinical trial participation. There’s a very large need for more targeted and specific treatments for the lupus population.”

The PALS program, performed at 5 academic medical centers, utilized a 2-arm, randomized pre-test, post-test, and follow-up study design. Investigators evaluated 4 cognitive outcomes: knowledge, self-efficacy, intentions, and attitudes. Those who participated in the program had statistically higher attitudes and knowledge about clinical trials, were more likely to intend to participate in these trials, and were more likely to follow through with the act of participating.

“Taking a step back, 68% of individuals who went through the program identified as Black or African American and 13% identified as Hispanic,” Donovan explained. “Those numbers are significantly higher than the population that you see participate in clinical trials. So, we were really drawing on the social support theory to develop this program, which has been shown to be effective in terms of how women of color, specifically Black or African American women, engage with the healthcare system. To our knowledge that had always been applied standard of care. We were then taking that and applying it specifically to clinical trials. I think the fact that we saw such high representation of individuals of color in this is really critical because as we know that this predominantly impacts women of color.”

These patients are often diagnosed at a later stage of disease and have worse morbidity and mortality. Therefore, including previously underrepresented patients in clinical trial populations may help to obtain health equity in lupus.

Related Videos
John Tesser, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, Midwestern University, and Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, and Lecturer, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, and Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates
Gaith Noaiseh, MD: Nipocalimab Improves Disease Measures, Reduces Autoantibodies in Sjogren’s
Laure Gossec, MD, PhD: Informing Physician Treatment Choices for Psoriatic Arthritis
Søren Andreas Just, MD, PhD: Developing AI to Mitigate Rheumatologist Shortages for Disease Assessment
Shreena K. Gandhi, MBBS: Recognizing Fibromyalgia as a Continuous Variable, Trait Diagnosis
Reducing Treatment Burden of Pegloticase for Uncontrolled Gout, with Orrin Troum, MD
Exploring CAR T-cell Therapy for Rheumatic/Autoimmune Diseases With Georg Schett, MD
John Stone, MD, MPH: Inebilizumab Efficacious for IgG4-Related Disease in MITIGATE Study
Uncovering the Role of COVID-19 in Rheumatic Disease, with Leonard Calabrese, DO
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.