Article

Can Efficacy of Rheumatoid Arthritis Medications Be Predicted?

Author(s):

Finding treatments for rheumatoid arthritis has proven to be a challenge in the medical community but researchers have found a potential way to help predict whether a medication will be effective in this patient population.

Finding treatments for rheumatoid arthritis has proven to be a challenge in the medical community but researchers have found a potential way to help predict whether a medication will be effective in this patient population.

According to study results published in PLOS1, researchers studying the benefits of tocilizumab (TCZ) and infliximab (IFX) found a connection between the former and levels of osteopontin, which could help direct which patients will benefit most from this option. The study noted that the results related to biologic-naïve patients in particular.

Over the course of the study patients were treated with either infliximab or tocilizumab starting in February of 2010 and were studied for at least a year until April of 2013. The patients were studied for several factors including disease duration, and doses of prednisone and methotrexate among others. There were 67 patients in the infliximab group and 70 in the tocilizumab group with all being of Japanese descent.

Looking at the two medications the researchers noted “no significant differences in the baseline characteristics except for methotrexate use between the groups.” They did however note low baseline osteopontin levels as a predictor of clinical disease activity index for the tocilizumab group.

Over the course of the study 7 patients in the infliximab group withdrew from the study for a variety of reasons including pneumonia, a reaction to the infusion, or “improvement of symptoms.” Three patients withdrew from the tocilizumab group “because of inefficacy,” and moving.

While not a definitive treatment direction the authors noted that as a single-center study, “Our study demonstrated that low serum OPN levels predict clinical remission after 1-year TC treatment but not IFX treatment.” They added, “Our prediction model provided insights into how to optimize the choice of biologics and warrants external validation in other cohorts.”

Related Videos
Kimberly A. Davidow, MD: Elucidating Risk of Autoimmune Disease in Childhood Cancer Survivors
Matthew J. Budoff, MD: Examining the Interplay of Coronary Calcium and Osteoporosis | Image Credit: Lundquist Institute
Orrin Troum, MD: Accurately Imaging Gout With DECT Scanning
John Stone, MD, MPH: Continuing Progress With IgG4-Related Disease Research
Philip Conaghan, MBBS, PhD: Investigating NT3 Inhibition for Improving Osteoarthritis
Rheumatologists Recognize the Need to Create Pediatric Enthesitis Scoring Tool
Presence of Diffuse Cutaneous Disease Linked to Worse HRQOL in Systematic Sclerosis
Alexei Grom, MD: Exploring Safer Treatment Options for Refractory Macrophage Activation Syndrome
Jack Arnold, MBBS, clinical research fellow, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine
John Tesser, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, Midwestern University, and Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, and Lecturer, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, and Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.