Article

High-risk Heart Patients Aren't Getting Proven Therapies

Findings from an American Heart Association study indicate that patients who are at a higher risk or mortality from heart failure are also at a higher risk of not receiving evidence-based treatments for the condition.

Findings from an American Heart Association (AHA) study indicate that patients who are at a higher risk or mortality from heart failure are also at a higher risk of not receiving evidence-based treatments for the condition. More high-risk patients have contraindications for receiving ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers, according to the research, which is published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.

Despite the fact that “the absolute benefits of an interventionare proportional to patients’ underlying risk, studiesin heart failure have noted a paradoxical inverse relationshipbetween treatment and risk,” say researchers. With that in mind, representatives from various medical institutions set out to determine the extent to which this reflectshigher rates of contraindications in patients with higher risk,or larger gaps in care quality. A group of 18,307 patients with leftventricular systolic dysfunction from 194 hospitals participating in the AHA’s Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)—Heart Failure program were categorized according to their estimated risk for in-hospitalmortality using a validated risk score.

Researchers determined—across all levels of risk—the percentage of patientswith contraindications to ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and β-blockers, as well as patients without contraindications, at hospital discharge. For each therapy, the percentage of patientswith contraindications was significantly higher with increasingpatient risk. Even after adjusting for contraindications, use of evidence-based treatments in high-risk patients was significantly lower.

The team concluded that “the use of evidence-based therapies is lowerin patients with heart failure at higher risk of mortality, bothbecause of higher rates of contraindications to therapy andlower rates of use among eligible patients.” Therefore, they recommend expanding the evidence base for treating high-risk patients and developing effective strategies to ensure all high-risk patients receive appropriate therapies.

Related Videos
Yehuda Handelsman, MD: Insulin Resistance in Cardiometabolic Disease and DCRM 2.0 | Image Credit: TMIOA
Nathan D. Wong, MD, PhD: Growing Role of Lp(a) in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment | Image Credit: UC Irvine
Laurence Sperling, MD: Expanding Cardiologists' Role in Obesity Management  | Image Credit: Emory University
Laurence Sperling, MD: Multidisciplinary Strategies to Combat Obesity Epidemic | Image Credit: Emory University
Matthew J. Budoff, MD: Examining the Interplay of Coronary Calcium and Osteoporosis | Image Credit: Lundquist Institute
Orly Vardeny, PharmD: Finerenone for Heart Failure with EF >40% in FINEARTS-HF | Image Credit: JACC Journals
Matthew J. Budoff, MD: Impact of Obesity on Cardiometabolic Health in T1D | Image Credit: The Lundquist Institute
Matthew Weir, MD: Prioritizing Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease | Image Credit: University of Maryland
Erin Michos, MD: HFpEF in Women and Sex-Specific Therapeutic Approaches | Image Credit: Johns Hopkins
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.