Article

Joint Destruction Reduced in RA with Certain Treatments

Treating rheumatoid arthritis with DMARDs, glucocorticoids, biologic agents, or a combination of agents reduces radiographic evidence of joint destruction.

A study conducted at Copenhagen University Hospital showed that treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), glucocorticoids, biologic agents, or a combination of agents significantly reduces radiographic evidence of joint destruction.

The study results were published in Arthritis & Rheumatism and also reveal that a direct comparison between the combination of a biologic agent plus methotrexate and the combination of 2 DMARDs plus initial glucocorticoids revealed no difference.

RA is commonly treated with DMARDs to slow the course of the disease. During the last 10 years, several effective, but expensive, immunoselective biologic agents have been introduced for the treatment of RA as well. Biologic agents are genetically engineered medications that help block the pathways of inflammation. Because of their expense, biologic agents are typically reserved as second-line drugs for patients who are unresponsive to DMARDs. However, in clinical trials, they have been used to treat patients who have not previously taken DMARDs and now some guidelines recommend biologic agents as first-line treatment for selected patients in whom a poor prognosis is suspected.

Radiographic progression is the most important measure of structural damage in RA. One of the claimed breakthroughs of biologic agents is their potential to arrest radiographic progression. The corresponding ability of DMARDs is less well defined because the effect of DMARDs on radiographic progression has only sporadically been investigated in randomized trials. The purpose of the present study was to quantify the effect of approved drugs and treatment methods (DMARDs, glucocorticoids, biologic agents, and combination treatments) on the yearly progression of radiographic joint destruction in patients with RA.

The researchers conducted a meta-analysis of full-length studies published in peer-reviewed journals. A total of 70 trials, including 112 comparisons, were identified. Participants included patients with RA diagnosed according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology.

A total of 16 interventions and 5 subinterventions were defined in five main groups: group one was defined as single DMARD versus single DMARD; group two was defined as single DMARD versus placebo or analog; group three was defined as combination DMARDs versus single DMARD; group four was defined as glucocorticoids with or without a DMARD versus placebo or analog with or without a DMARD; group five was defined as a combination biologic agent plus MTX versus MTX or other DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids.

Analysis revealed that treatment with a single DMARD or glucocorticoids significantly reduced radiographic evidence of joint destruction, with a relative effect of 48-72% as compared with placebo. Aggressive combination therapy with 2 to 3 DMARDs, a DMARD plus glucocorticoids, or a DMARD plus a biologic agent reduced radiographic joint destruction, with a relative effect of 50-84% as compared with single-DMARD therapy. The effect of a combination of two DMARDs plus step-down glucocorticoids did not differ from the effect of a biologic agent plus methotrexate.

“This is the first meta-analysis to include all of the antirheumatic drug treatment principles in a single review, including the effects of different combinations of drugs,” said study leader Dr. Niels Graudal, in a press release. “Our findings remove any previous doubt that may have existed about the efficacy of single-DMARD treatment on radiographic progression in RA. Furthermore, our findings confirm that aggressive treatment with combination DMARDs does reduce structural joint damage as compared with less-aggressive treatment with a single DMARD and that combination DMARD treatment, especially when combined with periodic glucocorticoids, may be as effective as a biologic agent plus MTX. The recommendation that treatment with a DMARD is the first choice for RA is therefore still valid.”

Related Videos
Kimberly A. Davidow, MD: Elucidating Risk of Autoimmune Disease in Childhood Cancer Survivors
Matthew J. Budoff, MD: Examining the Interplay of Coronary Calcium and Osteoporosis | Image Credit: Lundquist Institute
Orrin Troum, MD: Accurately Imaging Gout With DECT Scanning
John Stone, MD, MPH: Continuing Progress With IgG4-Related Disease Research
Philip Conaghan, MBBS, PhD: Investigating NT3 Inhibition for Improving Osteoarthritis
Rheumatologists Recognize the Need to Create Pediatric Enthesitis Scoring Tool
Presence of Diffuse Cutaneous Disease Linked to Worse HRQOL in Systematic Sclerosis
Alexei Grom, MD: Exploring Safer Treatment Options for Refractory Macrophage Activation Syndrome
Jack Arnold, MBBS, clinical research fellow, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine
John Tesser, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, Midwestern University, and Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, and Lecturer, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, and Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.