Article

Ken Gordon, MD: Role of Placebo in the UltIMMa Trials

Even in trials like UltIMMA that compare 2 drugs, a placebo control grounds the data, says Ken Gordon, MD.

The UltIMMa trials of risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy in treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis compared to ustekinumab. However, the trials also included a placebo arm, intended to ground the results by blinding participants and investigators.

Ken Gordon, MD, Professor and Chair of Dermatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, spoke with MD Magazine® about the role of placebo controls in trials like UltIMMa 1 & 2 at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) in Washington, DC.

“What happens when you have a non-placebo-controlled trial is outcomes are better—everyone knows they're on active drug,” said Gordon. He added that a placebo arm need not extend the full length of the trial to provide the benefits of comparison.

Gordon was an author of the poster, “Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: An Integrated Analysis of UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2,” which was shared at the AAD Annual Meeting, held March 1-5, 2019. Here are part 1 and part 2 of his interview on the UltIMMa trials.

MD Mag: What is the role of placebo in trials like UltIMMa that compare 2 drugs?

Gordon: The placebo control is actually really, really important. A lot of the comparator trials that have been done most recently, in a sort of post-marketing approach, have been non-placebo-controlled trials. What happens when you have a non-placebo-controlled trial is outcomes are better—everyone knows they're on active drug. And it's human nature to know that the likelihood of a patient response is going to go up. So, to have placebo control is extremely important.

When you look at registry trials, the trials that are pre-approval, almost always you have to have a placebo arm in them. It's short, it's not the full 52 weeks—it's 16 weeks, but the fact that it's there actually grounds the data much more accurately than if you don't have a placebo arm. Even if it's a short placebo arm it really actually probably lends greater credence to the study versus some of the other trials that you look at, where they don't have placebo arm, that were done post-marketing.

Related Videos
Daniel Wang: A More Appropriate Ferritin Threshold is Cost-Effective for Iron Deficiency Screening
Kimberly A. Davidow, MD: Elucidating Risk of Autoimmune Disease in Childhood Cancer Survivors
Yehuda Handelsman, MD: Insulin Resistance in Cardiometabolic Disease and DCRM 2.0 | Image Credit: TMIOA
Nathan D. Wong, MD, PhD: Growing Role of Lp(a) in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment | Image Credit: UC Irvine
Laurence Sperling, MD: Expanding Cardiologists' Role in Obesity Management  | Image Credit: Emory University
Laurence Sperling, MD: Multidisciplinary Strategies to Combat Obesity Epidemic | Image Credit: Emory University
Schafer Boeder, MD: Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1s in Type 1 Diabetes | Image Credit: UC San Diego
Matthew J. Budoff, MD: Examining the Interplay of Coronary Calcium and Osteoporosis | Image Credit: Lundquist Institute
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.