Article

RA Patients Willing to Be Research Subjects, Online Survey Finds

Author(s):

Nearly 1,000 rheumatoid arthritis patients members who follow the creakyjoints.org site said they would be willing to be research subjects.

Nearly 1,000 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are part of an online arthritis sufferers group said they are mostly open to the idea of participating in research about their condition, a recent survey found.

Reporting last month at the Annual European Congress of Rheumatology (in London, UK, study author W. Benjamin Nowell, PhD, said 970 members of CreakyJoints.org, a web-based international arthritis patient community, completed a survey on willingness to be research subjects.

The non-profit organization has both non-profit and pharma sponsors and says it has 100,000 "community members" who follow the site.

The survey was done because the organization was about to launch ArthritisPower.org, a research network funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

The questionnaire asked patients how willing they would be to participate in research, and under what circumstances.

For example, respondents were most amenable (93 percent) to accepting invitations by their physicians, with 66% saying they would be “very interested” and 27% “somewhat interested.”

The respondents were most likely to respond positively to requests by a medical school/hospital (83%), followed by a non-profit (79%), the government (73%), or a drug company (63%). The degree of interest dropped to half or less for solicitations to work with a private company (50%) or insurance company (46%).

The group members also listed reasons they would not participate.

Among US respondents, for example, a majority (75%) would refuse to participate in a study that required their social security numbers. Far fewer indicated that they would not participate if they had to provide their email address (20%) or their medical records (34%).

Overall, the leading potential factors cited as deterrents to participation were: “project not recommended by doctor” (30%); “individual results may not be kept private/confidential” (28%); and “project will take a lot of time” (25%).

The respondents were primarily female (93%) and white (85%), with a mean age of about 55.

The most frequent comorbidities listed by respondents were osteoarthritis (45%), fibromyalgia (26%), osteoporosis (18%), psoriatic arthritis (8%), lupus (5%), and ankylosing spondylitis (5%). Most indicated they were currently taking a DMARD (59%), or a biologic (50%), while 23% reported taking neither.

Related Videos
John Tesser, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, Midwestern University, and Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, and Lecturer, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, and Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates
Gaith Noaiseh, MD: Nipocalimab Improves Disease Measures, Reduces Autoantibodies in Sjogren’s
Laure Gossec, MD, PhD: Informing Physician Treatment Choices for Psoriatic Arthritis
Søren Andreas Just, MD, PhD: Developing AI to Mitigate Rheumatologist Shortages for Disease Assessment
Shreena K. Gandhi, MBBS: Recognizing Fibromyalgia as a Continuous Variable, Trait Diagnosis
Reducing Treatment Burden of Pegloticase for Uncontrolled Gout, with Orrin Troum, MD
Exploring CAR T-cell Therapy for Rheumatic/Autoimmune Diseases With Georg Schett, MD
John Stone, MD, MPH: Inebilizumab Efficacious for IgG4-Related Disease in MITIGATE Study
Uncovering the Role of COVID-19 in Rheumatic Disease, with Leonard Calabrese, DO
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.