April 2008

Concerns about online PHRs are overblown given that Americans have become avid users of Internet-based financial services.

Modern medicine has adopted technology and pushed the boundaries of science in impressive ways.

I believe the positives of e-mail far outweigh the negatives, for too many reasons to list.

An industry's preferred answer to the "build vs. buy" question can reveal much about its mindset and priorities.

In the coming months, you will probably hear and read a lot about personal health records, as two technology heavyweights roll out initiatives designed to spur the mass consumerization of health information. The race between Google and Microsoft to apply the resources of the Internet to personalized healthcare might be great for consumers, but how will physicians benefit, if at all?

For perhaps the first time, a social networking site geared to the young medical student or resident is now just a mouse click away.

To promote adoption, MGH has taken advantage of new safe harbors in Stark rules and anti-kickback legislation to subsidize software licenses, implementation services, and support services for participating practices affi liated with MaineGeneral hospitals.

With the field of PHRs now significantly expanding to include providers, payers, employers, and information technology industry giants, such as Microsoft and Google, public awareness and attitudes regarding PHRs have changed.

Allowing your patients to manage some aspects of their medical records seems like it could save your practice valuable time spent re-keying information scribbled onto forms, let alone some cold hard cash. But there are defi nite drawbacks and kinks that have yet to be worked out.

4 Questions with... Christine Chang, Healthcare Technology Analyst from Datamonitor.com