Opinion

Video

Faricimab Versus High-Dose Aflibercept for the Treatment of Neovascular AMD and DME

Retina specialists evaluate the effectiveness of the two new therapies for neovascular AMD and DME by analyzing their respective clinical trial methodologies and outcomes.

0:00 Introduction

1:05 Overview of faricimab and high-dose aflibercept

3:48 clinical trials for faricimab and high-dose aflibercept

9:12 Comparing the matched dose phase results in clinical trials

12:30 Potential impacts of Ang-2 inhibition

14:40 Real-world experience with faricimab

22:00 Challenges with step therapy

24:00 Choosing between faricimab vs high-dose aflibercept

29:00 Perspectives on retreatment criteria in clinical trials

33:00 Label differences between faricimab and high-dose aflibercept

35:00 Final remarks

Related Videos
Quan Dong Nguyen, MD: Phase 2 Neptune Trial Advances Brepocitnib for Uveitis | Image Credit: Stanford University
Charles C. Wykoff, MD, PhD: Phase 1b/2a Results on Restoret for DME, nAMD | Image Credit: Retina Consultants of Texas
Christine N. Kay, MD | Image Credit: Atsena Therapeutics
Rahul N. Khurana, MD: Phase 1 Results on Vamikibart for Uveitic Macular Edema | Image Credit: Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates
Sunir J. Garg, MD: | Image Credit: Wills Eye Hospital
Christine N. Kay, MD: Interim Data on ATSN-201 Shows Promise for XLRS | Image Credit: Vitreo Retinal Associates
Arshad Khanani, MD: First Results from Fellow Eye Dosing of RGX-314 in nAMD | Image Credit: Sierra Eye Associates
Joel A. Pearlman, MD, PhD: Phase 2a Data on Oral RZ402 for DME | Image Credit: Retina Consultants Medical Group
Roger A. Goldberg, MD: Pooled Visual Function Data of NT-501 for MacTel | Image Credit: Bay Area Retina Associates
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.