Publication

Article

Internal Medicine World Report

February 2015
Volume

For Older Diabetics, Tight Glycemic Control Comes with Risks

Author(s):

Research recently published in JAMA suggested physicians working to control older diabetics' glycemic levels were actually over treating them.

Research recently published in JAMA suggested physicians working to control older diabetics’ glycemic levels were actually over treating them.

For their study, Kasia J. Lipska, MD, MHS and her colleagues assessed National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data and included 1,288 diabetic patients who were 65 or older and had available hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurements.

To find out whether comprehensive glycemic control treatments were linked to diabetics’ quality of life, their overall health status was classified to 1 of 3 categories: complex/poor, complex/intermediate, or relatively healthy. A complex/poor rating was designated if the person had difficulty completing 2 or more daily activities or were on dialysis; complex/intermediate if they had trouble completing 2 tasks and were comorbid for 3 or more chronic conditions; and relatively healthy if none of these standards applied.

From a nationally representative sample, the investigators found 61.5% of patients (95% CI, 57.5%-65.3%), or 3.8 million Americans (95% CI, 3.4-4.2), with HbA1c levels less than 7% — indicating the patient underwent tight glycemic control — were considered relatively healthy, 63.0% (95% CI, 57.0%-68.6%) had complex/intermediate health, and 56.4% (95% CI, 49.7%-62.9%) were of very complex/poor health (P = .26).

Among patients with HbA1c levels less than 7% and were using insulin or sulfonylureas, the authors reported 54.9% (95% CI, 50.4%-59.3%) were relatively healthy, 58.7% (95% CI, 49.4%-67.5%) had complex/intermediate health, and 60.0% (95% CI, 51.4%-68.1%) had very complex/poor health (P= .14).

Concluding their study, the authors determined older diabetic patients weren’t likely to benefit from intensive glycemic treatment which, and are at risk for developing conditions like severe hypoglycemia based on insulin and sulfonylurea use.

“Recognition of both the harms and benefits of glycemic control is critical for patients and physicians and other health care professionals to make informed decisions about glucose-lowering treatment,” the writers urged.

Related Videos
Pranav Garimella, MBBS, MPH | Credit: GlobalNewsWire
Yehuda Handelsman, MD: Insulin Resistance in Cardiometabolic Disease and DCRM 2.0 | Image Credit: TMIOA
Laurence Sperling, MD: Expanding Cardiologists' Role in Obesity Management  | Image Credit: Emory University
Schafer Boeder, MD: Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1s in Type 1 Diabetes | Image Credit: UC San Diego
Matthew J. Budoff, MD: Examining the Interplay of Coronary Calcium and Osteoporosis | Image Credit: Lundquist Institute
Alice Cheng, MD: Exploring the Link Between Diabetes and Dementia | Image Credit: LinkedIn
Matthew J. Budoff, MD: Impact of Obesity on Cardiometabolic Health in T1D | Image Credit: The Lundquist Institute
Jennifer B. Green, MD: Implementation of Evidence-Based Therapies for T2D | Image Credit: Duke University
Ralph A. DeFronzo, MD: Noxious Nine and Mifepristone for Hypercortisolism in T2D | Image Credit: LinkedIn
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.