Article
Author(s):
On May 11, 2009 assemblyman Herb Conaway, Jr, District 7, and Upendra Chivukula, District 17 presented a bill which would make the distribution of any EMR in the state of NJ that is not certified by CCHIT illegal by January 1, 2011.
On May 11, 2009 assemblyman Herb Conaway, Jr, District 7, and Upendra Chivukula, District 17 presented a bill which would make the distribution of any EMR in the state of NJ that is not certified by CCHIT illegal by January 1, 2011.
On June 7, 2009 a brisk discussion on the constitutionality of this law is brought up at www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/19877.aspx?PageIndex=2. This is what was discussed:
"As used in the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.), unreasonable restraints of trade are illegal per se and interfere with free competition in business and commercial transactions. Such restraint tends to restrict production, affect prices, or otherwise control the market to the detriment of purchasers or consumers of goods and services. A restraint of trade that is ordinarily reasonable can be rendered unreasonable if it is accompanied by a Specific Intent to achieve the equivalent of a forbidden restraint."
Prohibiting agreements or practices that restrict free trading and competition between business entities. This includes in particular the repression of cartels.
Banning abusive behavior by a firm dominating a market, or anti-competitive practices that tend to lead to such a dominant position. Practices controlled in this way may include predatory pricing, tying, price gouging, refusal to deal, and many others.
Supervising the mergers and acquisitions of large corporations, including some joint ventures. Transactions that are considered to threaten the competitive process can be prohibited altogether, or approved subject to "remedies" such as an obligation to divest part of the merged business or to offer licenses or access to facilities to enable other businesses to continue competing.
The substance and practice of competition law varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Protecting the interests of consumers (consumer welfare) and ensuring that entrepreneurs have an opportunity to compete in the market economy are often treated as important objectives. In recent decades, competition law has been viewed as a way to provide better public services. Robert Bork has found that competition laws can produce adverse effects when they reduce competition by protecting inefficient competitors and when costs of legal intervention are greater then benefits for the consumers.
On June 7, 2009 Dr. Scot Silverstein wrote an open letter to Dr. Mark Leavitt, the CEO of CCHIT asking his opinion on the matter. The following day Dr. Leavitt answered, publishing an editorial disavowing any personal or CCHIT involvement in the formulation of this bill and that he thought that it was not “an appropriate use of health IT certification.”
On June 7, 2009 I published most of the known facts about assemblyman Conaway and what might have influenced his vote:
In 2008: www.njleg.state.nj.us/ethics/FinancialDisclosure/ConawayH2008.pdf
In 2007: www.njleg.state.nj.us/ethics/FinancialDisclosure/ConawayH2007.pdf
In 2006: www.njleg.state.nj.us/ethics/FinancialDisclosure/ConawayH2006.pdf
In 2005: www.njleg.state.nj.us/ethics/FinancialDisclosure/ConawayH2005.pdf
Follow-up was done on October 5, 2009 on this bill:
It seems that the bill was introduced, but not acted on.
Al Borges MD