Gastroenterology

In part 5 of our 5-part discussion, experts discuss their perspective on appropriate guidance for screening age and the future of CRC advocacy.

In part 4 of our 5-part discussion, experts discuss how to navigate conversations about risk factors and symptoms surrounding CRC.

In part 3 of our 5-part discussion, experts discuss the importance of screening among younger patient populations and strategies to encourage screening in patient populations susceptible to nonadherence.

In part 2 of our 5-part discussion, experts discuss challenges they face getting patients to engage in screening and how to effectively discuss screening with patients.

In part 1 of our 5-part discussion, experts discuss recent screening recommendation updates and the advent of new screening modalities.

The recent rise in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in younger patients has sparked a serious discussion about strategies to increase screening uptake and adherence, raising questions about the role of noninvasive tests versus the traditional “gold standard,” colonoscopy.

Qazi discusses the impact of having standardized definitions and treatment approaches for pouchitis and inflammatory conditions of the pouch.

The first quarterly issue of 2024 reviews a promising JAK inhibitor for acute severe ulcerative colitis, fenofibrates in PBC, new recommendations from the AGA, and a next generation multi-target DNA stool test for detecting colorectal cancer.

Recent recommendations from the AGA may help gastroenterologists manage the rising rate of pouchitis with the aid of clinical evidence.

Qazi discusses a review of the use of fenofibrate as a first-line therapy in treatment-naive patients with PBC and its implications for biochemical response.

New data suggest adding fibrate therapy to frontline PBC treatment could result in earlier and higher rates of biochemical response.

Qazi discusses tofacitinib’s role in acute severe ulcerative colitis management as a potential first-line therapy to increase treatment responsiveness.

Findings from a novel study supports the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib as a potential first-line therapy for ASUC.

Qazi discusses a review of the BLUE-C trial and explains the rise of noninvasive CRC screening and surveillance options, but highlights the need for colonoscopy nonetheless.

As clinicians work to improve CRC screening rates, a promising new test has shown favorable accuracy in detecting cases.

The post-hoc analysis found tenapanor significantly improved weekly scores for abdominal pain, discomfort, and bloating, as measured by the Abdominal Score.

Psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis occurred earlier in children and adolescents with IBD than in the matched references without IBD.

A hypothetical triennial blood-based screening test meeting Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage criteria was cost-effective versus no screening but not compared to FIT, sDNA-FIT, or colonoscopy.

Findings highlight non-inferiority for major morbidity and reduced detection of grade B or C POPF among patients who did not receive prophylactic passive abdominal drainage.

Results showed the cell-free DNA blood-based test had 83% sensitivity for colorectal cancer, 90% specificity for advanced neoplasia, and 13% sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions.

A new study suggests a next-generation stool DNA test from Exact Sciences has improved sensitivity for colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions but lower specificity than FIT.

The submission could grant guselkumab its third indication, after being approved by the FDA for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Test your knowledge of the AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Fecal Microbiota-Based Therapies for Select Gastrointestinal Diseases with this clinical quiz!

Jairath discusses disease clearance and optimal treatment targeting in UC, highlighting what the ongoing VERDICT trial hopes to add to our understanding of improving patient outcomes.

In the final part of our 3-part series, our panel of experts discuss what their fields and its leaders could do to make sure this lack of diversity in trials does not continue. These responses are highlighted in the following video and transcribed below.

In part 2 of our 3-part series on the impact of clinical trials lacking diversity, we are spotlighting responses to our second question, which addresses how the previously established lack of diversity in clinical trials has had a direct effect on the development and application of new therapies or devices in real-world settings.

In part 1 of our 3-part series on the impact of clinical trials lacking diversity, we are spotlighting responses to our first question, which sought to encapsulate the perspectives of our group of experts on how a historic lack of diversity in clinical trials has manifested itself in today’s care of patients from diverse backgrounds.

This article serves as a landing page for our 3-part series spotlighting how a lack of diversity in clinical trials has had a deleterious downstream effect on real-world care for people of color in the US, with perspective from experts across more than half a dozen specialties.

Positive topline results show apraglutide outperformed placebo for relative change from baseline in actual weekly parenteral support volume at week 24 in adults with SBS-IF.

Our February 2024 month in review highlights EoE pipeline news, new FMT guidelines, and research about endoscopic inflammation and disease activity in IBD.